
The Spy Ending Explained: The Final Letter and the Firing Squad: Deconstructing the Tragic, Triumphant Ending of Paulo Coelho’s The Spy
The final moments of a life, immortalized on the page, hold a unique and shattering power. In Paulo Coelho’s The Spy, the ultimate chapter on the life of Margaretha Zelle—the infamous exotic dancer and courtesan known as Mata Hari—is one of profound injustice, stoic defiance, and a quiet, literary triumph. The book, structured as Mata Hari’s final letter to her lawyer, Maître Édouard Clunet, culminates not in a thrilling spy-novel escape, but in an inescapable, historical tragedy that serves as a searing critique of the patriarchal forces that condemned her.
The Inevitable Execution: History’s Unjust Decree
Coelho opens and closes the novel with the grim inevitability of the firing squad. The chilling prologue describes the meticulous, almost mundane preparations for her execution on October 15, 1917. This initial flash-forward sets an emotional trap for the reader: we know the destination, but the journey—Mata Hari’s own recounting of her life—compels us to believe in an alternate fate.
The climax of the narrative is not a twist of plot, but the denial of a pardon. Despite the compelling case presented in her letter—her lifelong pursuit of self-creation, her naiveté in a world of war, and the lack of concrete evidence for the charge of being a German spy—the French military tribunal remains unyielding. This, Coelho suggests, is not a failure of justice, but the successful execution of a scapegoating campaign. France, demoralized and desperate for a public victory during World War I, required a high-profile, foreign figure to blame for its staggering military losses. Mata Hari, with her international connections, lovers in high places, and independent, convention-shattering lifestyle, was the perfect, conspicuous pawn.
Thus, it comes with the ending is a powerful statement: the system did not convict a spy; it assassinated a ‘New Woman‘ who dared to live outside its bounds.
The Defense of the Lawyer: The Voice of Conscience
Therefore, while Mata Hari’s final letter constitutes the bulk of the novel, the true emotional conclusion rests in the letter written to her by Maître Clunet, which is delivered the night before her execution. This shift in perspective is a masterstroke.
Clunet’s letter confirms all of Mata Hari’s fears and the reader’s suspicions. He lays bare the political machinations—the pressure from the military, the calculated dismissal of her appeal, and the cowardice of her powerful former lovers who refused to testify on her behalf. This letter is the novel’s final, undisputed truth. It confirms that the evidence was circumstantial, the trial was a sham, and her conviction was a pre-ordained verdict fueled by wartime hysteria and social prejudice.
Maître Clunet’s deep-seated affection and respect for his client elevate the tragedy from a simple historical retelling to a humanist lament. He doesn’t just mourn the loss of a life; he laments the failure of justice and the triumph of a cruel, misogynistic world. His closing thoughts are a desperate, helpless plea to a higher power, an acknowledgment that earthly institutions failed her completely.
The Triumph of Defiance: Mata Hari’s Enduring Legacy
The ultimate power of the ending is the manner of Mata Hari’s final performance. Coelho meticulously details the scene: her refusal of the blindfold, her elegant attire, and the famous account of her facing the firing squad with an unwavering gaze. This is the act of a warrior, a final moment of self-possession that reclaims her dignity from her executioners.
She is executed, but she is not defeated. Her closing quote, cited early in the book but resonating at the end, is her enduring philosophy: “I don’t know if the future will remember me, but if it does, may it never see me as a victim, but as someone who moved forward with courage, fearlessly paying the price she had to pay.”
Furthermore, Coelho’s narrative, crafted from her purported final thoughts, achieves the very justice her trial denied. It strips away the myth of the femme fatale spy and reveals the vulnerable, yet relentlessly ambitious woman beneath—a symbol of female independence punished by a society terrified of its own loosening moral strictures. The book is, in essence, a literary rehabilitation of her image.
Coelho’s Signature Themes in the Conclusion
This book is a great read, other like many of Coelho’s bestsellers, The Spy uses a historical figure to explore universal spiritual and philosophical concepts and at the end, leaves a great message to the world leaving how Mata Hari was a courageous woman ahead of her time.
- The Price of Personal Legend: Mata Hari, like the Shepherd Boy in The Alchemist, followed a singular, extraordinary dream—to be unique and free. The execution is the ultimate, terrible Price paid for her “Personal Legend.” It underscores the novel’s tragic lesson: to dare to be different is to invite the world’s condemnation.
- Feminism and Patriarchy: The ending is an indictment of a patriarchal system. Mata Hari’s true crimewas not espionage, but her financial and sexual liberation in a world where women were expected to be confined to domestic roles. She was a courtesan who chose her lovers and controlled her own narrative, which was simply unforgivable to the male establishment.
- Self-Actualization vs. Historical Fate: Coelho argues that while a historical figure’s fate is sealed, their spirit and the meaning of their life can be reclaimed. Mata Hari’s final moments are a defiant statement that her identity and freedom were internal, and that her execution was a political error, not a moral correction.
In the end, The Spy is a haunting epitaph, granting Margaretha Zelle the final, powerful word she was denied in life. She falls, but her courage ensures that history, thanks to voices like Coelho’s, remembers her not as a double agent, but as a fearless pioneer whose only true crime was being an independent woman ahead of her time. You may also like “The Woman In Cabin 10” Ending Explained


